Magnesium-zirconium alloying

ABSTRACT

Zirconium sponge can be chemically depassivated by treatment with hydrofluoric acid to improve the ability of molten magnesium/magnesium alloy to dissolve zirconium from the treated zirconium sponge and to form a melt containing substantially evenly distributed particles of zirconium. Optical micrographs showing the grain refining ability of pretreated sponge when added to pure magnesium at 680° C. All micrographs are of the same magnification. (a) Pure magnesium, (b) after adding 1 wt % sponge followed by 20 minutes manual stirring, and (c) after a further 10 minutes stirring.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the addition of zirconium to pure magnesium or magnesium alloys and to the preparation of magnesium-zirconium (Mg—Zr) alloys, including Mg—Zr master alloys.

BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION

Zirconium is a potent grain refiner for magnesium alloys which contain negligible amounts of elements with which zirconium forms stable compounds, such as Al, Si, Fe, Ni, Co, Sn and Sb. Zirconium additions of about 1% by weight to such magnesium alloys can readily cause the grain size to decrease by 80% or more under normal cooling rates. The exceptional grain refining ability makes zirconium an important alloying element for magnesium alloys that are not based on alloying with Al and Si. For example, zirconium containing Mg-RE-Zn alloys such as EZ33 (Mg-3.3RE-2.7Zn-0.6Zr) and ZE41 (Mg-1.2RE-4.2Zn-0.7Zr) offer a specific combination of elevated temperature and room temperature properties which are not readily achievable with the Mg—Al—Zn alloys.

The solubility of zirconium in molten pure magnesium is approximately 0.6%, which slightly increases with increasing melt temperature. It has been reported that the most characteristic feature of the microstructure of a magnesium alloy that contains more than a few tenths per cent soluble zirconium is the zirconium-rich cores that exist in most of the magnesium grains. These zirconium-rich cores are believed co be the products of peritectic solidification. In order to achieve excellent grain refinement in commercial production, it is desirable to dissolve the full zirconium content (ie, about 0.6%) in a magnesium melt

Over the decades various approaches to introducing zirconium into molten magnesium have been explored, including:

-   -   (a) alloying with different forms of zirconium metal;     -   (b) alloying with zirconium sponge;     -   (c) alloying with Zn—Zr master alloys;     -   (d) alloying with ZrO₂;     -   (e) alloying with various zirconium halides or complex halides         or a mixture of halides and/or complex halides with different         salts such as NaCl, KCl, BaCl₂, NaF, KF, etc; and     -   (f) alloying with Mg—Zr master alloys.

The advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches have been discussed in detail by Saunders and Strieter (W. P. Saunders and F. P. Strieter, “Alloying Zirconium to Magnesium”, Transactions of the American Foundrymen's Society, 1952, Vol. 60, pp. 581-594) and Emley (E. F. Emley, “Principles of Magnesium Technology”, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966, pp. 127-155). Since about 1960, only Mg—Zr master alloys have been in widespread commercial use as sources of zirconium for alloying with magnesium. These Zr-rich Mg—Zr master alloys are generally made by chemical reduction by magnesium of salt mixtures based on zirconium fluorides or zirconium chlorides A master alloy, developed by Magnesium Elektron Ltd (MEL) in about 1945 via chemical reduction of a complex zirconium fluoride by molten magnesium, has been long known as Zirmax (trade mark). A similar type of Mg—Zr master alloy was developed in the United States at about the same time based on a chloride salt reduction process.

Zirmax type master alloys remain the primary zirconium alloying material used for the commercial production of zirconium-containing magnesium alloys. Zirmax contains approximately 33% zirconium and 67% magnesium and most of the zirconium is present as various sizes of zirconium particles (mostly in the range of submicron to 10 μm) in a magnesium matrix.

Prior to Zirmax type master alloys becoming a standard source of zirconium for the production of zirconium-containing magnesium alloys, alloying with various forms of zirconium metal were investigated.

Sauerwald published work on alloying zirconium metal powder to magnesium in 1947 (V. F. Sauerwald, “Dus Zustandsdiagram Magnesium-Zirkonnium”, Zeitschrift fur anorganische Chemie., 1947, Band 255, pp. 212-220). He added 5 wt % zirconium metal powder to magnesium under an argon atmosphere at various temperatures between 680 and 1100° C. Soluble zirconium contents exceeding 0.5 wt % (samples were digested in HCl acids) were obtained at all temperatures tested. In the same year, Ball reported work (C. J. P. Ball, “Metallurgia”, 1947, Vol. 35, pp 125-129; 211) stating that metallic zirconium dissolves in magnesium under an argon atmosphere at 900-1100° C. but that it was a difficult and costly process. Operating at such temperatures is not commercially feasible in view of vaporisation of magnesium. Emley reported in 1948 (E. F. Emley, “Discussions of the Faraday Society”. 1948-49, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 219) that as zirconium metal powder is expensive and highly inflammable, it is natural to consider the possibility of alloying by a reducible zirconium compound.

In 1952, Saunders and Strieter reported their investigations in which different forms of metallic zirconium, (ie, zirconium sponge, fused zirconium, iodide-decomposed ductile zirconium, and zirconium powder) were investigated as zirconium alloying materials for magnesium at 760° C. (1400 F). The fused lump zirconium was added as 6.35-mm (¼-in.) pieces in a small steel ladle and stirred in the ladle with a steel rod. No apparent solution had occurred after 30 minutes of stirring. Analysis of the melt showed a result of 0.03% soluble zirconium content with 1% zirconium addition. Iodide zirconium sheet, rolled to about 127-254 μm (0.005-0.010 in.) and cut into 6.35 mm (,b {fraction (1/4)}-in.) squares was added in a manner similar to that used for the fused lump zirconium. It was stirred for several minutes in the ladle. It was found that after 65 minutes of holding at temperature, the resultant soluble zirconium content merely reached 0.1% with 1% zirconium addition. The use of zirconium powder was evaluated by adding it in various ways because zirconium powder is pyrophoric and some means of protecting the powder from oxidation had to be applied. Zirconium powder was pelleted with various binders, zirconium powder was enclosed in tight magnesium capsules, zirconium powder was compacted with magnesium powder, and zirconium powder was used in the form of sintered zirconium powder briquettes. In general, with 3% zirconium addition to a Mg—5Zn melt, the resultant zirconium content was reported as varying between 0.7 and 0.85%. The solubility of zirconium in magnesium is influenced by the presence of a third element. It was reported that with the presence of Zn at a level around 3-4%, the solubility of Zr in magnesium could be increased from 0.6% to slightly over 0.7% and 5% zinc increases the solubility of Zr in magnesium to about 0.8%.

According to Saunders and Strieter, of the various metallic forms of zirconium tested, alloying with zirconium sponge demonstrated the most promising results. The zirconium sponge used was made by the Kroll process

-   ((a) zirconium tetrachloride is produced by the action of chlorine     and carbon on a zirconium oxide such as baddeleyite (ZrO₂) of zircon     (ZrSiO₄) ZrO₂+2Cl₂+2C (900° C.)→ZrCl₄+2CO, or ZrSiO₄+4Cl₂+4C (900°     C.)→ZrCl₄+SiCl₄+4CO; -   (b) the resultant zirconium tetrachloride is separated from iron     trichloride (from iron impurities) and silicon tetrachloride (if     present) by fractional distillation; and -   (c) the purified zirconium tetrachloride is reduced by reaction with     molten magnesium under argon to produce “zirconium sponge”—ZrCl₄+2Mg     (1100° C.)→Zr+2MgCl₂).

In their experiments, the sponge was essentially ground with the average size being reduced to about 12.7 μm or 0.0005 in. The results showed that zirconium sponge produced a soluble zirconium content of about 0.62-0.66% in Mg—5Zn alloys with 3% zirconium addition after 3-4 minutes stirring. With 1% zirconium sponge addition, soluble zirconium contents in the range of 0.32 to 0.52% were achieved. Furthermore, the authors found that the alloying efficiency decreased when the sponge fragments were decreased in size because when the particles became finer powder, the material burned up before it could be submerged beneath the melt. Therefore, some means of protecting the powder from oxidation had to be applied.

Despite the excellent alloying results demonstrated by the work of Saunders and Strieter with Kroll process zirconium sponge, alloying zirconium sponge to magnesium was in general limited to laboratory scales. As realised and pointed out by Saunders and Strieter, “an important disadvantage in the commercial use of sponge in the magnesium alloying field is the rather laborious effort required to alloy the material”. This laborious effort apparently refers to the grinding process because the alloying process employed, ie, 3-4 minutes of stirring, was plainly simple. In addition, the unavoidable contamination problem arising from the grinding process is another important disadvantage in the commercial use of zirconium sponge.

In Principles of Magnesium Technology, Emley similarly commented about alloying zirconium metal to magnesium: “pure zirconium metal is expensive by any route and very inflammable in powder form, and for these reasons, coupled with the ease with which it becomes contaminated with oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen, the approach via zirconium metal is not obviously the best”.

Experiments have indicated that in commercial production of magnesium alloys, when Zirmax is dissolved into a magnesium melt at commercially useful addition rates, undissolved zirconium particles can be readily observed in the microstructure of the magnesium alloy produced (Ma Qian, L. Zheng, D. Graham, D. H. StJohn and M. T. Frost, “Settling of undissolved zirconium particles in pure magnesium melts”, Journal of Light Metals, 2001, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 157-165 and Y. Tamura, N. Kono, T. Motegi and E. Sato, “Grain refining mechanism and casting structure of Mg—Zr alloys”, Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 1998, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 185-189). Many of these residual (undissolved) zirconium particles have an average size of around 5 μm.

The density of zirconium is 6.5 gcm⁻³ whereas the density of molten magnesium is 1.6 gcm⁻³. Zirconium particles therefore have a strong tendency to settle in a magnesium melt unless stirred vigorously. The larger the particle, the faster it settles to the bottom of the melt. For example, a 15-micron zirconium particle has been found to fall at approximately 40 mm/min to the bottom of a magnesium melt at 780° C. and is therefore difficult to maintain such particles suspended in a melt at this temperature. By contrast, when the particle size is smaller than 3 microns, it can be readily suspended in a magnesium melt at the same temperature.

Chambers Science and Technology Dictionary (1991) defines “passivity” as “Lack of response of metal or mineral surface to chemical attack such as would take place with a clean, newly exposed surface. Due to various causes, including insoluble film produced by ageing, oxidation, or contamination; run-down of surface energy at discontinuity lattices; adsorbed layers . . . ” Throughout this specification, the terms “depassivate”, “depassivated” and “depassivating” are to be understood to have meanings derived from the foregoing definition of “passivity”.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating zirconium metal, the method comprising chemically depassivating the zirconium metal. The zirconium metal is preferably zirconium sponge with the method forming treated zirconium sponge. The zirconium sponge may be chemically depassivated by treatment with a source of fluoride ions. The source of fluoride ions may be hydrofluoric acid. The source of fluoride ions may be a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid.

The hydrofluoric acid preferably has a concentration between 0.1% and 50%, more preferably between 0.1% and 5%, and most preferably between 0.1% and 2.5%, with the acid concentrations calculated as shown later in this specification. These acid concentration ranges correspond respectively to about 0.05-25 molar, 0.05-2.5 molar and 0.05-1.25 molar. Efficacy at concentrations less than 0.1% HF, for example 0.07% (about 0.035 molar), has been demonstrated.

In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating zirconium sponge, the method comprising treating the zirconium sponge with a solution containing fluoride ions to form treated zirconium sponge.

The zirconium sponge is preferably a porous agglomerate of zirconium grains. Preferably, the sponge is formed by the Kroll process.

Preferably, the sponge comprises zirconium with only incidental impurities. Hafnium is a common impurity in zirconium. In contrast, Fe, Ni, Al, Si, C, Co, Sn and Sb are undesirable as they are alloying inhibiting and their total concentration is preferably less than 1% and, more preferably less than 0.5%.

Preferably, the zirconium sponge is in the physical form of small particles and each particle has a porous structure. Preferably, these zirconium sponge particles have the following properties:

-   -   the particles have an average size between 0.1 to 10 mm, more         preferably between 0.5 and 5 mm     -   the particles have a minimum size of 0.5 mm, more preferably 1         mm, and a maximum size of 10 mm, more preferably 5 mm     -   density of sponge=5.2-6.3 g/cm³, more preferably 5.5-5.8 g/cm³     -   porosity of sponge (1−density of sponge/density of solid         zirconium)=0.08-0.2, more preferably 0.11-0.15.     -   the void sizes on a polished transverse section of each         zirconium sponge particle are in general between 5 and 60 μm.

In a third aspect, the present invention provides treated zirconium sponge prepared by a method according to the first or second aspects of the present invention.

As compared with untreated (as received) zirconium sponge, treatment of zirconium sponge in accordance with the present invention has been found to improve the ability of molten magnesium/magnesium alloy to dissolve zirconium and to form a melt containing substantially evenly distributed particles of zirconium.

In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides zirconium sponge comprising an agglomerate of zirconium particles and having a surface layer containing fluorine containing compounds at least partially coating at least some of the particles. The fluorine containing compounds are preferably zirconium fluoride compounds and may be compounds of the formula ZrxFy.nH₂O.

In a fifth aspect, the present invention provides a method of manufacturing a magnesium-zirconium master alloy, the method comprising the steps of:

-   -   (a) mixing treated zirconium sponge according to the third         aspect of the present invention or zirconium sponge according to         the fourth aspect of the present invention with molten         magnesium/magnesium alloy to form a magnesium-zirconium melt         containing dissolved zirconium and zirconium particles; and     -   (b) casting the magnesium-zirconium melt to solidify as the         magnesium-zirconium master alloy.

Preferably, the sponge is mixed with the molten magnesium/magnesium alloy by stirring.

In a sixth aspect, the present invention provides a magnesium-zirconium master alloy manufactured by a method according to the fifth aspect of the present invention. Preferably, the master alloy contains 10%-50%, more preferably 20%-40%, zirconium in magnesium/magnesium alloy. Preferably, at least 90% of the zirconium particles in the master alloy are sized less than 5 μm, more preferably less then 3 μm. Preferably, the average particle size is less than 5 μm.

In a seventh aspect, the present invention provides a magnesium-zirconium master alloy containing dissolved zirconium and zirconium particles in the substantial absence of halide inclusions wherein 90% of the zirconium particles are sized less then 5 μm, preferably less than 3 μm.

Preferably, the master alloy is cast as ingots, which term is to be understood to include briquettes, pellets and the like.

In an eighth aspect, the present invention provides a method of adding zirconium as an alloying element to molten magnesium/magnesium alloy, the method comprising mixing treated zirconium sponge according to the third aspect of the present invention or zirconium sponge according to the fourth aspect of the present invention with the magnesium/magnesium alloy.

In a ninth aspect, the present invention provides a method of adding zirconium as an alloying element to molten magnesium/magnesium alloy, the method comprising mixing a magnesium-zirconium master alloy according to the sixth or seventh aspects of the present invention with the molten magnesium/magnesium alloy.

Preferably, the amount of zirconium added to the molten magnesium/magnesium alloy is greater than that required to saturate the magnesium/magnesium alloy with zirconium at the temperature of the melt.

In a tenth aspect, the present invention provides a magnesium alloy containing zirconium prepared by a method according to the eighth or ninth aspects of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

In order that the invention may be more fully understood there will now be described, by way of example only, preferred embodiments and other elements of the present invention with reference to the below mentioned accompanying illustrations.

FIGS. 1(a)-(c) are micrographs illustrating the grain refining ability of as-received and untreated zirconium sponge when added to pure magnesium at 730° C. All three micrographs are of the same magnification. FIG. 1(a) is pure magnesium, FIG. 1(b) is after addition of 1 wt % untreated zirconium sponge followed by 30 minutes of manual stirring, and FIG. 1(c) is after addition of a further 1 wt % untreated zirconium sponge followed by a further 30 minutes of manual stirring.

FIGS. 2(a)-(c) are micrographs illustrating the grain refining ability of as-received and untreated zirconium sponge when added to pure magnesium at 780° C. All three micrographs are of the same magnification as in FIGS. 1(a)-(c). FIG. 2(a) is pure magnesium, FIG. 2(b) is after addition of 1 wt % untreated zirconium sponge followed by two minutes of manual stirring and then 30 minutes holding at 780° C., and FIG. 2(c) is after a further holding of 210 minutes at 780° C.

FIGS. 3(a)-(c) are micrographs illustrating the grain refining ability of treated zirconium sponge of the present invention when added to pure magnesium at 680° C. All three micrographs are of the same magnification as in the previous figures. FIG. 3(a) is pure magnesium, FIG. 3(b) is after addition of 1 wt % treated zirconium sponge followed by 20 minutes of manual stirring, and FIG. 3(c) is after a further 10 minutes of manual stirring.

FIGS. 4(a)-(c) are micrographs illustrating the grain refining ability of treated zirconium sponge of the present invention when added to pure magnesium at 730° C. All three micrographs are of the same magnification as in the previous figures. FIG. 4(a) is pure magnesium, FIG. 4(b) is after addition of 1 wt % treated zirconium sponge followed by 30 minutes manual stirring, and FIG. 4(c) is after 30 minutes of holding and then a further two minutes of manual stirring.

FIGS. 5(a)-(c) are micrographs illustrating the grain refining ability of treated zirconium sponge of the present invention when added to pure magnesium at 800° C. All micrographs are of the same magnification as in the previous figures. FIG. 5(a) is pure magnesium, FIG. 5(b) is after addition of 1 wt % treated zirconium sponge followed by 30 minutes of manual stirring, and FIG. 5(c) is after 30 minutes of holding and then a further two minutes of manual stirring.

FIG. 6 is a photograph showing the physical form of untreated (as received) zirconium sponge particles as used in one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a micrograph showing a view of a typical microstructure of the zirconium sponge particles shown in FIG. 6 after treatment in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a micrograph showing a view of an alternative microstructure for the zirconium sponge particles shown in FIG. 6 after treatment in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating a method of adding treated zirconium sponge to molten magnesium.

FIGS. 10 and 11 show typical views of the microstructure of an ingot of master alloy produced according to the present invention.

FIGS. 12 and 13 show typical views of commercially available Zirmax master alloy.

FIGS. 14 and 15 show typical views of the microstructure of an ingot of master alloy produced according to the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a micrograph showing reaction products left on zirconium sponge particles after treatment in accordance with the present invention.

EXAMPLES

Comparative Trial

An untreated (as received) zirconium sponge in the physical form of zirconium sponge particles of size 1-10 mm diameter was selected. The major impurity in the sponge was hafnium. The impurity concentrations were:

-   -   Hf=0.8% approx     -   Fe+Cr=0.1%     -   C=0.004%     -   H=0.001%     -   N=0.002%

The sponge was added, without treatment in accordance with the present invention, to two samples of molten magnesium at 730 and 780° C. respectively. Cone samples (φ30×φ20×25 mm) were collected at different times and examination showed little evidence of grain refinement (see FIG. 1 and FIG. 2) even when the melt was held at 780° C. for 2 to 6 hours. Wet chemical analyses of the soluble zirconium contents in the samples using 15% HCl acid showed negligible zirconium contents (<0.05%).

Preparation of Treated Zirconium Sponge

Zirconium sponge identical to that used in the Comparative Trial above was first immersed in an acid solution which was prepared in the following manner:

45 ml of concentrated nitric acid (68.5%-69.5%) and 45 ml of concentrated hydrofluoric acid (50%) were combined and diluted in water to a total of 1000 ml. This gave an acid solution of approximately 3% HNO₃ and 2% HF, which equates to approximately 1.1 molar HF and 0.5 molar HNO₃.

The zirconium sponge was left in this acid solution for 5 minutes. Bubbling was observed which indicated that the acid had probably at least partially removed the ZrO₂ layer and was dissolving some of the zirconium metal underneath. After removal from the acid solution the zirconium sponge was rinsed in ethanol and dried under heating lamps at approximately 50° C. for 60 minutes. Water was also found to be a suitable rinsing agent.

The treated zirconium sponge used in preparing the alloys depicted in FIGS. 3-5 was prepared by immersing zirconium sponge identical to that used in the Comparative Trial in a HF solution for 5 minutes followed by rinsing in water and drying. The HF solution was prepared by diluting 45 ml of concentrated HF (50%) in water to a total of 1,000 mls to give approximately 2.25% HF which equates to approximately 1 molar HF.

An alternative acid solution which was successfully used was 0.07-0.25% HF. This is a very dilute HF acid solution and is readily handled.

Treated zirconium sponge was prepared by immersing zirconium sponge identical to that used in the Comparative Trial in a 2% HF solution for 4 minutes followed by rinsing in water and drying. The reaction products of the treatment are evident as the white phases on the sponge particles in FIG. 16.

Although it is thought that successful treatment involves the dissolution or some physical removal of oxide from the Zr surface, we do not wish to be bound by any theory as to why such treatment is effective.

XPS analyses of treated and untreated sponge particles gave the results set out in Table 1 below. The treated particles were immersed in 0.5% HF solution for 4 minutes, rinsed with water and dried. For each analysis given, information was collected from a depth of 5 nanometers or 10 atomic layers on the surfaces of six different large particles. TABLE 1 XPS analyses of treated and untreated sponge particles Sponge Surface composition in atom percentage Particles C O Zr Fe Si F Cl Mg Hf Untreated 30.5 49.2 16.2 1.1 3.0 0 0 0 0 Treated 10.3 43.3 14.9 1.3 2.3 27.8 0 0 0 particles (black) Treated 26.0 41.1 15.6 1.1 1.7 27.4 0 0 0 particles (grey)

According to the energy level detected for each element, O is present in the form of ZrO₂ in all three cases studied and the detected F in the treated particles is present in the form of Zr_(x)F_(y).nH₂O, such as ZrF₄.

In all of the experiments conducted it was observed that the weight of the sponge particles decreased with increasing treatment time in the acid solution until all of the particles disappeared or the HF was consumed.

Although we did not wish to be bound by any theory, it is presently thought that the mechanism is that the treatment results in the oxide film on each sponge particle being partially or totally removed and a layer of reaction products (possibly Zr_(x)F_(y).nH₂O), either continuous or discontinuous, being formed on the particles. Owing to the formation of the Zr_(x)F_(y).nH₂O patches or coating on the sponge particles, oxidation of zirconium beneath these patches or the coating would be prevented after treatment. It is thought that the patches then dissolve into molten magnesium, leaving parts of the zirconium surface exposed to the molten magnesium thereby providing fresh contact sites for the molten magnesium. BSE images have revealed that there are many tiny channels in each sponge particle which provides an explanation for the disintegration of the sponge particles.

The above proposed mechanism is offered only as a possible explanation of the experimental results and there could be other mechanism(s). The present invention may incorporate but is not to be considered limited by the mechanism described.

Preparation of Magnesium-Zirconium Alloy

A hole was machined into a small piece of magnesium ingot and the required pieces of treated zirconium sponge were placed into the hole as illustrated in FIG. 9. This piece of ingot was then quickly submerged below the magnesium melt surface. This allowed the treated zirconium sponge to be introduced directly to the melt without the possibility of it remaining on the surface of the melt. The approach avoided the treated sponge being trapped in the dross and avoided the treated sponge not being wetted by the melt. The sponge could be added to the melt in various other ways, such as by adding a compact of sponge particles, providing that it is successfully introduced below the surface.

It has been found that, alternatively, the zirconium sponge particles can be directly added to the melt under certain circumstances. An example is if the magnesium melt surface is protected with cover gas such as 1% SF₆ (balance: 49.5% CO₂ and 49.5% dry air), and the concentration of oxygen above the surface of the magnesium melt is therefore very low, the sponge particles can be successfully added directly providing it is done quickly. For example, the zirconium sponge particles can be added at a height of 800 mm away from the melt surface through a steel funnel, where the bottom of the funnel is placed just above the melt surface. This allows the sponge particles to quickly get into the melt without being oxidised. This has been proved to be a very convenient way of adding small (<5 mm) zirconium sponge particles to magnesium melts.

After addition of the treated zirconium sponge at a rate of 1% by weight, the melt was left for a couple of minutes to reheat to the correct temperature and was then stirred for 30 minutes. Three temperatures were used: 680° C., 730° C. and 800° C. Cone samples were collected at different times after the addition of the treated zirconium sponge.

FIGS. 3 to 5 show a typical view of the grain structures achieved from the three tests, respectively.

Results of wet chemical analysis are summarised in Table 2 which lists the wet chemical analysis results of soluble. zirconium contents in samples taken from all three alloying tests. TABLE 2 Soluble and total zirconium contents of samples by wet chemical analysis (%) Alloying temperatures 680° C. 730° C. 800° C. 1 wt % sponge 1 wt % sponge 1 wt % sponge addition addition addition Soluble* Total** Soluble Total Soluble Total Before <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 addition 30 min. 0.48 0.93 0.56 0.76 0.54 0.92 stirring A further 0.56 0.85 0.56 0.66 30 min. holding Restirring 0.56 0.97 0.57 0.74 for 2 min. *Soluble: 15% HCl **Total: 50% HCl + 6% HF

As can be seen, the soluble zirconium content reached 0.56% at both 730° C. and 800° C. after 30 min. stirring. This is very close to the solubility limit of zirconium, ie, 0.6 wt %, in molten pure magnesium. The soluble zirconium contents achievable by addition of the same amount of zirconium from Zirmax master alloy have been reported as generally less than 0.5% and are typically around 0.4% at 720° C.—see Y. Tamura, N. Kono, T. Motegi and E. Sato, “Grain refining mechanism and casting structure of Mg—Zr alloys”, Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 1998, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 185-189. The use of pretreated zirconium sponge showed a better recovery compared with the use of the Zirmax master alloy.

Stability of Treated Zirconium Sponge

A solution of 0.4% HF was prepared by adding 40 ml of 10% HF to 960 ml of water. Zirconium sponge identical to that used in the Comparative Trial was immersed in the 0.4% HF at room temperature for 5 minutes and then rinsed in water and dried. The dry treated zirconium sponge were stored in a plastic bag.

After four weeks of storage, 300 g of the treated zirconium sponge particles were added to 30 kg of pure magnesium at 680° C. and stirred. Chill bar samples (25 mm in diameter) were cast prior to addition of the treated zirconium sponge particles, after 30 minutes of stirring, and after 60 minutes of stirring.

Very good grain refinement was achieved after 30 minutes of stirring. The soluble and total zirconium contents were 0.38% and 0.69% respectively after 30 minutes of stirring which increased to 0.42% and 0.81% respectively after 60 minutes of stirring.

Preparation of Magnesium-Zirconium Master Alloy

A total of 150 g of treated zirconium sponge particles in the size range of approximately 1-3 mm was added to a 550 g magnesium melt at 730° C. The nominal addition of zirconium was approximately 25 wt %. These zirconium particles were added in two batches. Stirring was applied throughout the whole alloying process. The melt was cast into a steel ingot mould after 60 minutes of stirring.

FIGS. 7 and 8 show typical views of the microstructure of the treated zirconium sponge. Owing to the gradual dissolution of the porous structure, each zirconium sponge particle will eventually be disintegrated into many fine zirconium particles sized about 2-3 μm. Production of a suspension of fine zirconium particles in the melt is enhanced by maintaining gentle stirring throughout.

The magnesium-zirconium melt produced as described above can be cast into different moulds, preferably into chill moulds. Preferably the height of each ingot is not much greater than 500 mm unless the mould employed has an excellent chilling effect. Where possible, a low casting temperature such as 680° C. or lower is preferred. Cover gas should be used during casting.

FIGS. 10 and 11 show typical views of the microstructure of the ingot produced according to the above description with 25% zirconium addition. The white phases are zirconium particles. FIGS. 12 and 13 show typical views of MEL's Zirmax master alloy. As can be seen, the zirconium particles present in the master alloy of the present invention are in general smaller than those present in Zirmax. Small zirconium particles are always highly preferred as discussed earlier.

A magnesium-zirconium master alloy containing approximately 50 wt % zirconium was prepared by adding 440 g of treated zirconium sponge particles to 440 g of molten magnesium at 700° C. with slow manual stirring for 90 minutes. FIGS. 14 and 15 are typical views of the microstructure of an ingot cast on completion of the stirring in which the grey particles are zirconium and the white phases are magnesium.

Preparation of Magnesium-Zirconium Alloy from Magnesium-Zirconium Master Alloy

Magnesium-zirconium master alloy containing approximately 25 wt % zirconium (prepared in accordance with the present invention) was added to a crucible containing 30 kg of molten magnesium at 730° C. The master alloy was preheated to approximately 175° C. prior to addition to the crucible and sufficient master alloy was added to give a zirconium addition of approximately 1 wt %.

Following addition of the master alloy, the melt was stirred with a mechanical stirrer at 150 rpm for 5 minutes. Thereafter, the melt was allowed to settle for 15 minutes and a 30 mm thick plate sample (160 mm×140 mm) was then sand cast at 730° C. A plate sample of the pure magnesium was also sand cast at 730° C. prior to addition of the master alloy. The pure magnesium plate sample had an average grain size of approximately 10,000 μm. After alloying with the master alloy the resultant plate sample had an average grain size of 98 μm, a soluble zirconium content of 0.49% and a total zirconium content of 0.58%.

It is to be understood that where the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising”, are used in this specification, unless the context requires otherwise such use is intended to imply the inclusion of a stated feature or features but is not to be taken as excluding the presence of other feature or features.

The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment or any form of suggestion that such prior art forms part of the common general knowledge in Australia or elsewhere. 

1. A method for treating zirconium metal, the method comprising chemically depassivating the zirconium metal.
 2. A method for treating zirconium sponge, the method comprising chemically depassivating the zirconium sponge to form treated zirconium sponge.
 3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the zirconium sponge is chemically depassivated by treatment with a source of fluoride ions.
 4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the source of fluoride ions is an acidified solution containing fluoride ions.
 5. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the source of fluoride ions is hydrofluoric acid.
 6. A method for treating zirconium sponge, the method comprising treating the zirconium sponge with a solution containing fluoride ions to form treated zirconium sponge.
 7. Treated zirconium sponge prepared by a method as claimed in claim
 2. 8. Zirconium sponge compromising an agglomerate of zirconium particles and having a surface layer containing fluorine containing compounds at least partially coating at least some of the particles.
 9. Zirconium sponge as claimed in claim 8 wherein fluorine containing compounds are zirconium fluoride compounds.
 10. Zirconium sponge as claimed in claim 9 wherein the zirconium fluoride compounds have the formula Zr_(x)F_(y).nH₂O.
 11. A method of manufacturing a magnesium-zirconium master alloy, the method comprising the steps of: (a) mixing treated zirconium sponge as claimed in claim 7 with molten magnesium/magnesium alloy to form a magnesium-zirconium melt containing dissolved zirconium and zirconium particles; and (b) casting the magnesium-zirconium melt to solidify as the magnesium-zirconium master alloy.
 12. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy manufactured by a method as claimed in claim
 11. 13. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy as claimed in claim 12 containing 10-50% by weight zirconium.
 14. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy as claimed in claim 12 containing 20-40% by weight zirconium.
 15. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy as claimed in claim 12, wherein 90% of the zirconium particles are sized less than 5 μm.
 16. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy containing dissolved zirconium and zirconium particles in the substantial absence of halide inclusions, wherein 90% of the zirconium particles are sized less than 5 μm.
 17. A magnesium-zirconium master alloy as claimed in claim 15 wherein 90% of the zirconium particles are sized less than 3 μm.
 18. A method of adding zirconium as an alloying element to molten magnesium/magnesium alloy, the method comprising mixing treated zirconium sponge as claimed in claim 7 with the molten magnesium/magnesium alloy.
 19. A method of adding zirconium as an alloying element to molten magnesium/magnesium alloy, the method comprising mixing a magnesium-zirconium master alloy as claimed in claim 12 with the molten magnesium/magnesium alloy.
 20. A magnesium alloy containing zirconium prepared by a method as claimed in claim
 18. 